<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solid State Drives in 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.breakitdownblog.com/solid-state-drives-in-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.breakitdownblog.com/solid-state-drives-in-2008/</link>
	<description>A technical, gaming and current-events news site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:00:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Riyad Kalla</title>
		<link>http://www.breakitdownblog.com/solid-state-drives-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-8746</link>
		<dc:creator>Riyad Kalla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakitdownblog.com/2007/08/24/solid-state-drives-in-2008/#comment-8746</guid>
		<description>Neil, I&#039;m jealous... very jealous.

I got a ThinkPad T60 with a 9-cell and the 3-cell ultrabay for the *express purpose* of being ultra-mobile. No one told me that the Ultrabay batteries are complete trash (they are Sony-branded batteries, and I&#039;m on my 3rd one, they last about 3 months before they can only hold 1/2 the charge... amounting to about 20mins of time).

My 9-cell was only ever at 3hrs with ridiculously low settings and 2.5 with normal settings... overall it was a complete bust as far as &quot;ultra portable day-computing&quot; goes... complete bullshit.

I&#039;m amazed the 1330 can get upwards of 6hrs mobile... that&#039;s nuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil, I&#8217;m jealous&#8230; very jealous.</p>
<p>I got a ThinkPad T60 with a 9-cell and the 3-cell ultrabay for the *express purpose* of being ultra-mobile. No one told me that the Ultrabay batteries are complete trash (they are Sony-branded batteries, and I&#8217;m on my 3rd one, they last about 3 months before they can only hold 1/2 the charge&#8230; amounting to about 20mins of time).</p>
<p>My 9-cell was only ever at 3hrs with ridiculously low settings and 2.5 with normal settings&#8230; overall it was a complete bust as far as &#8220;ultra portable day-computing&#8221; goes&#8230; complete bullshit.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m amazed the 1330 can get upwards of 6hrs mobile&#8230; that&#8217;s nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.breakitdownblog.com/solid-state-drives-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-8745</link>
		<dc:creator>Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakitdownblog.com/2007/08/24/solid-state-drives-in-2008/#comment-8745</guid>
		<description>The XPS 1330 like a similar Apple model were apparently made by ASUS... I was never sorry with the ASUS I bought some 4+ years ago... solid, reliable, beautiful machine... My Toshiba Tecra was always a bit of a let down... This Dell is pure bliss... 
Dell XPS 1330:
I&#039;ve a 2.4Ghz, 64Gig SSD, 4Gig memory, 8400 screen card. Light and very portable, good battery life (4-6 hours), nice keyboard and screen. If you want to run heavy games then the graphics card will be too light... if you don&#039;t need to be portable, go for a larger one... 1530 is good too. The Dell XPS 1330, with a SSD is great!!!
Not sorry at all... Excellent build quality and service.
Need to decide on your storage capacity though... 
Big drives available if you want... I&#039;m not sure how quiet they are... I&#039;ve never had a desktop or laptop run as quiet or as cool as this babay...now nearly 5 months old... bought when my 2-y old Toshiba Tecra M4 crashed [motherboard failure - lost data...]... under warranty... its been limping ever since... multiple repairs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The XPS 1330 like a similar Apple model were apparently made by ASUS&#8230; I was never sorry with the ASUS I bought some 4+ years ago&#8230; solid, reliable, beautiful machine&#8230; My Toshiba Tecra was always a bit of a let down&#8230; This Dell is pure bliss&#8230;<br />
Dell XPS 1330:<br />
I&#8217;ve a 2.4Ghz, 64Gig SSD, 4Gig memory, 8400 screen card. Light and very portable, good battery life (4-6 hours), nice keyboard and screen. If you want to run heavy games then the graphics card will be too light&#8230; if you don&#8217;t need to be portable, go for a larger one&#8230; 1530 is good too. The Dell XPS 1330, with a SSD is great!!!<br />
Not sorry at all&#8230; Excellent build quality and service.<br />
Need to decide on your storage capacity though&#8230;<br />
Big drives available if you want&#8230; I&#8217;m not sure how quiet they are&#8230; I&#8217;ve never had a desktop or laptop run as quiet or as cool as this babay&#8230;now nearly 5 months old&#8230; bought when my 2-y old Toshiba Tecra M4 crashed [motherboard failure - lost data...]&#8230; under warranty&#8230; its been limping ever since&#8230; multiple repairs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riyad Kalla</title>
		<link>http://www.breakitdownblog.com/solid-state-drives-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-8744</link>
		<dc:creator>Riyad Kalla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakitdownblog.com/2007/08/24/solid-state-drives-in-2008/#comment-8744</guid>
		<description>Neil what do you think of the 1330 overall? I have been thinking about getting that laptop for a while or maybe the 1530, I think they both look awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil what do you think of the 1330 overall? I have been thinking about getting that laptop for a while or maybe the 1530, I think they both look awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.breakitdownblog.com/solid-state-drives-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-8742</link>
		<dc:creator>Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakitdownblog.com/2007/08/24/solid-state-drives-in-2008/#comment-8742</guid>
		<description>I have had a SSD 60gb drive in my laptop Dell xps 1330, since October 2007... and boy is it quiet.. the battery life is great - nearly 6 hours, boot up fast...
I only had to compromise on size... waiting to get another SSD this time an express slot 64 plus gb. Then I&#039;ll not look back at all at &gt; 120gb.
Once you&#039;ve driven a Ferrari, you feel like only driving a Ferrari or walking... in between is frustrating and noisy. I only need to get a quieter clock... the ticking is getting to me now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had a SSD 60gb drive in my laptop Dell xps 1330, since October 2007&#8230; and boy is it quiet.. the battery life is great &#8211; nearly 6 hours, boot up fast&#8230;<br />
I only had to compromise on size&#8230; waiting to get another SSD this time an express slot 64 plus gb. Then I&#8217;ll not look back at all at &gt; 120gb.<br />
Once you&#8217;ve driven a Ferrari, you feel like only driving a Ferrari or walking&#8230; in between is frustrating and noisy. I only need to get a quieter clock&#8230; the ticking is getting to me now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Samsung SSD: 100 MB/sec Write, 120 MB/sec Read &#124; The "Break it Down" Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.breakitdownblog.com/solid-state-drives-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-6438</link>
		<dc:creator>New Samsung SSD: 100 MB/sec Write, 120 MB/sec Read &#124; The "Break it Down" Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakitdownblog.com/2007/08/24/solid-state-drives-in-2008/#comment-6438</guid>
		<description>[...] the sometimes lack-luster performance. It&#8217;s true that in some cases the drives can perform pretty phenomenally (0.1ms seek times for example) but some of the read/write numbers were previously not much better [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the sometimes lack-luster performance. It&#8217;s true that in some cases the drives can perform pretty phenomenally (0.1ms seek times for example) but some of the read/write numbers were previously not much better [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The &#8220;Break it Down&#8221; Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hybrid Hard Drives Aren&#8217;t Impressive</title>
		<link>http://www.breakitdownblog.com/solid-state-drives-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-5723</link>
		<dc:creator>The &#8220;Break it Down&#8221; Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hybrid Hard Drives Aren&#8217;t Impressive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakitdownblog.com/2007/08/24/solid-state-drives-in-2008/#comment-5723</guid>
		<description>[...] will truly see the speed increases&#8230; which is likely true since you are essentially creating a tiny SSD ontop of an existing HD, but the cost of that much flash ram would make producing and buy drives [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will truly see the speed increases&#8230; which is likely true since you are essentially creating a tiny SSD ontop of an existing HD, but the cost of that much flash ram would make producing and buy drives [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The &#8220;Break it Down&#8221; Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hard Drives with DDR Ram</title>
		<link>http://www.breakitdownblog.com/solid-state-drives-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-5470</link>
		<dc:creator>The &#8220;Break it Down&#8221; Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hard Drives with DDR Ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakitdownblog.com/2007/08/24/solid-state-drives-in-2008/#comment-5470</guid>
		<description>[...] the drives don&#8217;t offer much better performance than what is expected, and not as close to the insane performance of SSDs.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the drives don&#8217;t offer much better performance than what is expected, and not as close to the insane performance of SSDs.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
