<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Samsung SSD: 100 MB/sec Write, 120 MB/sec Read</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.breakitdownblog.com/new-samsung-ssd-100-mbsec-write-120-mbsec-read/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.breakitdownblog.com/new-samsung-ssd-100-mbsec-write-120-mbsec-read/</link>
	<description>A technical, gaming and current-events news site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:00:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Intel Z-P140 SSD Kicks Other SSD&#8217;s Asses &#124; The "Break it Down" Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.breakitdownblog.com/new-samsung-ssd-100-mbsec-write-120-mbsec-read/comment-page-1/#comment-7622</link>
		<dc:creator>Intel Z-P140 SSD Kicks Other SSD&#8217;s Asses &#124; The "Break it Down" Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakitdownblog.com/new-samsung-ssd-100-mbsec-write-120-mbsec-read/#comment-7622</guid>
		<description>[...] past few months, with the general consensus being that they are small in capacity but fast. Some user comments have suggested that stability and longevity of these devices just isn&#8217;t there yet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] past few months, with the general consensus being that they are small in capacity but fast. Some user comments have suggested that stability and longevity of these devices just isn&#8217;t there yet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riyad Kalla</title>
		<link>http://www.breakitdownblog.com/new-samsung-ssd-100-mbsec-write-120-mbsec-read/comment-page-1/#comment-7557</link>
		<dc:creator>Riyad Kalla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakitdownblog.com/new-samsung-ssd-100-mbsec-write-120-mbsec-read/#comment-7557</guid>
		<description>Hot damn are you serious? I thought the big benefit to these things was suppose to be stability in addition to the speed.

I&#039;m surprised, given how pervasive flash memory is now, that the SSDs are so unstable in their current many-GB sizes.

I think I&#039;ll stay away for at least another 2 years and let someone else work the bugs out of it. Having a drive go crappy on you is about the worst thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hot damn are you serious? I thought the big benefit to these things was suppose to be stability in addition to the speed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised, given how pervasive flash memory is now, that the SSDs are so unstable in their current many-GB sizes.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ll stay away for at least another 2 years and let someone else work the bugs out of it. Having a drive go crappy on you is about the worst thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich entusiast</title>
		<link>http://www.breakitdownblog.com/new-samsung-ssd-100-mbsec-write-120-mbsec-read/comment-page-1/#comment-7556</link>
		<dc:creator>rich entusiast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakitdownblog.com/new-samsung-ssd-100-mbsec-write-120-mbsec-read/#comment-7556</guid>
		<description>I have been playing with SanDisk 1,8 and 2,5&quot; SSD drives and can tell you that they aint good.
I havent yet tried with other brands (one IDE Samsung waiting in drawer, MITRON shipping), but the problem is not so much performance - yes, write is sloooow -- but reliability. 
Today the 2,5&quot; piece went bad 3rd time already, it just starts corrupting files and/or filesystems. At first I thought that that particular item is bad, but no, yesterday the 1,8 piece died as well. The same symptoms.
Tried both XP and Vista, no difference.

So, for me the technology seems too early to adopt yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been playing with SanDisk 1,8 and 2,5&#8243; SSD drives and can tell you that they aint good.<br />
I havent yet tried with other brands (one IDE Samsung waiting in drawer, MITRON shipping), but the problem is not so much performance &#8211; yes, write is sloooow &#8212; but reliability.<br />
Today the 2,5&#8243; piece went bad 3rd time already, it just starts corrupting files and/or filesystems. At first I thought that that particular item is bad, but no, yesterday the 1,8 piece died as well. The same symptoms.<br />
Tried both XP and Vista, no difference.</p>
<p>So, for me the technology seems too early to adopt yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
