FastSilicon has the scoop on Samsung announcing their new ultra-fast, ultra-low energy 64GB SSDs (Solid State Drives).
We have covered SSD development quite a bit in the past, including the sometimes lack-luster performance. It’s true that in some cases the drives can perform pretty phenomenally (0.1ms seek times for example) but some of the read/write numbers were previously not much better than say a standard Western Digital Raptor drive.
Luckily it looks like these new badboys from Samsung not only use 1/2 the power that previous-gen SSDs did, but they also sport sustained 100 MB/sec write rates and 120 MB/sec read rates.
You may be saying “well my Raptor can burst to that, who cares?”, well the answer is that your Raptor might burst, but it’s sustained transfer rate is more around 40 MB/sec. An interesting trait of SSDs is that when they transfer, it’s a solid sustained transfer, there doesn’t seem to be a “burst” to speak of. This may be due to the insanely fast seek times; check out Notebook Review’s benchmarking of some SSDs, notice the transfer rate graphs are more or less just flat lines at a certain speed.
The only problem now is that these SSDs, likely for the next 2 years, will be targeted at high end servers or rich enthusiasts, as the price point for 64GB SSDs is around $1200 from Newegg… a far cry from anything affordable for Joe-computer-user-that-didn’t-win-the-lottery.
So I wouldn’t go adjusting your Newegg wish list or new-computer-build list just yet, give it a few more years until SSDs are up to 100+ GB in size, and around $500… then I’d say jump on it like hotcakes.























December 17th, 2007 at 10:11 am
I have been playing with SanDisk 1,8 and 2,5″ SSD drives and can tell you that they aint good.
I havent yet tried with other brands (one IDE Samsung waiting in drawer, MITRON shipping), but the problem is not so much performance - yes, write is sloooow — but reliability.
Today the 2,5″ piece went bad 3rd time already, it just starts corrupting files and/or filesystems. At first I thought that that particular item is bad, but no, yesterday the 1,8 piece died as well. The same symptoms.
Tried both XP and Vista, no difference.
So, for me the technology seems too early to adopt yet.
December 17th, 2007 at 10:23 am
Hot damn are you serious? I thought the big benefit to these things was suppose to be stability in addition to the speed.
I’m surprised, given how pervasive flash memory is now, that the SSDs are so unstable in their current many-GB sizes.
I think I’ll stay away for at least another 2 years and let someone else work the bugs out of it. Having a drive go crappy on you is about the worst thing.