<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Claims Upcoming Core i7 Nehalem Architecture to be 50% Faster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.breakitdownblog.com/intel-claims-upcoming-core-i7-nehalem-architecture-to-be-50-faster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.breakitdownblog.com/intel-claims-upcoming-core-i7-nehalem-architecture-to-be-50-faster/</link>
	<description>A technical, gaming and current-events news site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:00:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Intel Core i7 (Nehalem) 25% Faster Than Core 2 Platforms &#124; The "Break it Down" Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.breakitdownblog.com/intel-claims-upcoming-core-i7-nehalem-architecture-to-be-50-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-12053</link>
		<dc:creator>Intel Core i7 (Nehalem) 25% Faster Than Core 2 Platforms &#124; The "Break it Down" Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakitdownblog.com/?p=4236#comment-12053</guid>
		<description>[...] not quite the &#8220;50-100% faster&#8221; claims that Intel was making&#8230; or even the &#8220;50% faster across the board&#8221; claims they made, Nehalem is still looking like a nice upgrade over the current Core 2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not quite the &#8220;50-100% faster&#8221; claims that Intel was making&#8230; or even the &#8220;50% faster across the board&#8221; claims they made, Nehalem is still looking like a nice upgrade over the current Core 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
