This was originally posted over at Engadget but I thought it was damn handy, so here’s a reproduction of the best portion of it:
| Capacity | |||
| Blu-Ray | HD DVD |
||
| ROM single layer: ROM dual layer: RW single layer: RW dual layer: Highest test: Theoretical limit: |
23.3 / 25GB 46.6 / 50GB 23.3 / 25 / 27GB 46.6 / 50 / 54GB 100GB 200GB |
Single layer: Dual layer: - - Highest test: Theoretical limit: |
15GB 30GB - - 45GB 60GB |
| Codecs | |
| Blu-Ray | HD DVD |
| MPEG-2 Microsoft Video Codec 1 (aka VC1, WMV HD, etc.) H.264 / MPEG-4 AVC |
MPEG-2 Microsoft Video Codec 1 (aka VC1, WMV HD, etc.) H.264 / MPEG-4 AVC |
| Security | |
| Blu-Ray | HD DVD |
| Mandatory HDCP encrypted output ROM-Mark watermarking technology BD dynamic crypto (physical layer) Advanced Access Content System (AACS) |
Mandatory HDCP encrypted output (for HD) Volume identifier (physical layer) Advanced Access Content System (AACS) |
There is more information over at Engadget about studios and what not, but as far as the technical specifications of the HD-media goes this was the best portion of it.
The information spun out of a conversation with a friend about how the initial offerings of BluRay releases are using MPEG-2 encoding instead of something sexier like MPEG-4. Most likely reason is royalty payments as Ars points out, with Sony owning patents on MPEG-2 (Scroll down to the Following the Money part). I wonder if additional concerns could be with the actual processors in the media playing units. Pushing a full 1080p 1920×1080 signal using MPEG-2 is hard enough, are the processors powerful enough to decode a MPEG-4 or VC1/WMV HD signal on the fly without noticable choppiness? I have no idea. I also know that the form factor of a media player is considerably different than a dual core/dual processor desktop with a high-speed chip and graphics card that is able to perform the same function. Maybe specialized hardware is the answer here?
Call me crazy, but I’ll stick with the greedy-son-of-bitches theory for Sony, I can’t imagine why I would think that though…



March 17th, 2008 at 6:29 am
Good article that shows why blu-ray won over hd-dvds