RSS

Dow Down 700 Pts Again, After Bailout… Herald in the Amero and the North American Union

Oct 6, 2008    (Click to Rate!) Loading ... Loading ...

Life & World


The first time the $700 billion buyout bailout was voted on, it failed, and the Dow dropped 770 pts.

The next time it was voted on, and passed, the Dow dropped.

The last time it was re-voted on it finally passed and what’s that? Yep, the Dow dropped another 700 pts just for good measure.

How did this happen? Didn’t that “much needed” $700 billion buy us back our economy and let things rock and roll like the good old days? Nope, not even close.

Before we go any further, I really recommend setting aside 10mins, or even 5mins, to begin watching the “How the Banking System Really Works” series on YouTube, if you aren’t fascinated within the first 5mins, you can stop watching it, but chances are you will baffle at how our banking system actually creates money:

NOTE: It is not done using gold or some other logical mechanism that you learned about in school. The debt itself plus it’s interest-potential is what actually creates the money.

Now if you gave that a quick watch and got the gist of how our banking system started off and how quickly, way back in those days (talking centuries ago), it became necessary and easy for bankers to create wealth out of thin air, the idea of a few entities 100s of years later controlling the mass majority of wealth in our functioning world doesn’t seem so far-fetched. When you think that banks got all high-tech and greedy in the last 10 years, it seems impossible, but that’s not how it happened.

Now give this movie a quick glance, it’s only a few mins long, and explains why the $700 billion really could do nothing to save our economy. Our economy functions at a burn rate in the trillions of dollars, throwing $700 billion into the pot is like pissing into your swimming pool and wondering why it’s not flooding over.

YouTube Preview Image

The movie analyzes how much money, namely trillions, has been created over the last few years just to shore up our economy and keep it running. You might have also noticed that there seems to be no oversight or voting taking place on this money-creation policy, it just keeps happening.

So the bubble keeps growing and growing, our currency keeps slipping and slipping and now some might say the bubble is in the process of bursting because of “Bad choices”.

Seriously? Bad choices?

Our government has 100+ years of financial history to draw on, the most powerful computers in the world, the most brilliant financial minds and no one can figure out what was going to happen 40 years ago? 10 years ago? 10 years from now?

No way. The stage is being set for NAU.

NAU – North American Union, that would represent a union between Canada, the U.S. and Mexico all with a single currency: The Amero.

YouTube Preview Image

Rumors about the Amero have been circling for 10 years now, with reports of Bush continuing talks with Mexican presidents about how to better unify the continent, opening borders and streamlining travel across the country lines. The only way to ever successfully unify the three countries would first require the US Dollar to be depressed enough, and the American people scared enough, to adopt a new currency with the promise of a revised economy with open-arms.

Such a move would be impossible while the US Dollar was strong.

What we have seen over the last 5 years is exactly what, with this move continuing to inject money into a system so flush and laden with cash that the only thing it’s doing is slowly down the house of cards from collapsing, it’s not a real solution… a real solution is something completely different from what is being done and about any senior economist with a clear picture of the US’s financial habits likely has input on.

The government isn’t retarded, as much as we would like to think, they know this, and there are entire departments who’s job it is to keep this economy healthy and functioning. Destroying this country and having our economy collapse in a giant disaster doesn’t help any country on this planet, it would effect everyone.

We are actually watching an agenda get executed here, slowly, over some years, beginning with policies that would ensure a depressed dollar and eventually grease the wheels for what needed to get done.

I personally think combining into the North American Union could be a really awesome growth opportunity for us collectively as a continent. Bringing the low-cost of Mexico production up into the entrepreneurship of the US… and I guess Canada has really nice people which is awesome, but more importantly establishing more official relationships with regards to natural-fuel collection and distribution (natural gas, oil, etc.) would give all the countries a chance to adjust their focus and growth towards a collective future.

It is estimated this combination of the world’s countries into localized unions has been in the books for quite a while now and began with the European Union as the test-bed. I’d say so far they are doing OK?

As this world’s population gets larger, and the planet gets smaller, growth and assimilation like this is inevitable. It seems scary because it’s all coverty, but you couldn’t execute a plan like this over night or any other way. Try and come out on CNN Financial news and account that America will be changing it’s currency and let me know how that goes once all the markets in the world crash simultaneously. Hell… just try and get us on the metric system with a single announcement and let me know how that goes.

Update #1: Iceland’s economy is collapsing and one of the proposed solutions is to have Iceland join the European Union. Sound familiar? Thanks Marc!

Update #2: Very interesting, the House wasn’t too happy about being pressured into passing this. In private conversations they were told that the market would drop 2-3k points each day, for the first 2 days and some other congressman were told that the US Govt would invoke martial law if the $700 billion bailout wasn’t passed.

YouTube Preview Image

Update #3: Author Naomi Wolf (Give me Liberty) is interviewed and gives input about the congressman’s comment around minute 8. She also mentions that on October 1st, this year, the 1st Brigade of the 3rd Infrantry Division (3-4k soldiers) was deployed within the US for the first time since 1807 with the mission of “Crowd Control” and “Subduing Unruly Individuals” (re: Army Times). In addition to that there was a $100 billion provision in the “bail out” giving the president unlimited oversight on how to spend those funds without discretion. So awesome… the president has his own army now.

I can’t imagine why that was necessary or what it’s going to be used for, but if I had to guess I’d say this is all in preparation for announcing Amero/NAU and stymieing any protesting against it immediately with brute force to ensure the transition goes over (smoothly or not).

YouTube Preview Image

Pretty interesting developments, similar to things that happened in the 1920s in some other <cough> countries.

Update #4: Ignoring the dooms-day stuff, and given that we don’t know, won’t know and are never told truly what happens in a countries day-to-day existence, do you think there is any other way to try and unit Canada and Mexico with the US in a successful way by voting? I couldn’t see that ever getting voted through and that would make the World Bank sad.

But seriously… honestly, aren’t we all going to unit at some point? Ok fine, not tomorrow, but what 50 years? 100 years? 200 years? When the population is 30 billion? I’m just wondering if this is postponing the inevitable?

Update #5: Alex Jones has Brad Sherman on the air and takes a look at the mobilization of the army within the US and the shift of the National Guard from answering to the governors to president along with full economic control by the treasury and not the congress anymore. Pretty interesting:

YouTube Preview Image
Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Propeller
  • Mixx
  • Fark
  • FriendFeed
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Print
, , , , , , , , , ,

This post was written by:

Riyad Kalla - who has written 1727 posts on The “Break it Down” Blog.

"Ultimately I just want to provide a resource that folks find useful."

4 Comments For This Post

  1. John Maszka Says:

    This bailout is just one more example of the indivisible handjob stroking irresponsible CEOs and CFOs with billions so that they can run the American economy even further into the ground. So much for Keynesian economics. If the goal is to stimulate the economy, why not give the money directly to the American taxpayer? A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush administration.

  2. Editor Says:

    John,

    I think the problem is that the bailout, in reality, wasn’t intended to stimulate the economy. From the looks of what it *really* takes to run our economy and how much money has been created every year for the last few years just to keep it up, $700 billion really doesn’t seem like it can do much.

  3. Jen Clark Says:

    The $700 billion was a heist, plain and simple. They gave $100 billion to the President and $250 to Henry Paulson (who was the CEO of Goldman Sachs until 2 years ago) to use immediately. They will hand out the money to whomever does what they say.

    That’s plenty of money for them to do just about anything they want – right now. Congressional oversight is a joke.

    I think Editor is on to something when he says that this looks like a stepping stone towards the North American Union. I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised.

    I also understand why you say that we might just be delaying the inevitable, but I don’t think this has to be true. The amount of power that has been collected, especially with the financial power given the Bush administration through the “bailout”, is immense. But our quiet acceptance is the only way to guarantee that the United States is destroyed and turned into the NAU.

    And isn’t the quiet acceptance of the destruction of the United States the opposite of loving your country?

    Anyway, we only get this one planet to live on, so there is a point where a small group of people can rule the entire world. I think that is the ultimate goal of the people in power.

    We used to be a collection of 50 states. Now state borders don’t matter as much as they used to because so much power rests with the Federal government. Europe used to be a collection of relatively small but fiercely independent countries. Now, when you travel among them, the differences are fading away. Power consolidation on a global scale has been underway for a long time now.

    Yet when a hurricane, or earthquake, or flood, or tornado hits, your survival depends on a neighbor or friend who makes sure to find you. When you run out of milk, your dinner depends on the local grocery store or next door neighbor having a little extra.

    We live our lives locally yet we are quietly accepting less and less control over our own lives and communities.

    We don’t have to. We do have a choice whether to fight for our country, the country that was founded on the idea of personal freedom, or to let it die.

    The question we need to ask ourselves is how much do we really care about the United States?

  4. Editor Says:

    Jen,

    Excellent followup. Unfortunately with so much debt and distraction (HD TV, flashy TV ads, credit card bills, things to complain about or things to buy) I don’t think many people will care until those attractions are taken away from them.

    So as long as we have our Starbucks, HD TV, episodes of Lost and new cars that we can’t afford, it seems like 70% of us are completely happy just sitting back and doing nothing.

    Playing devil’s advocate for a second, to fight that hand and foot, what are we fighting for in the grander scope? Less Starbuck’s? That probably won’t happen, the free market will make sure of that.

    It’s when I took a step back and made a list of both sides, the “We are a democracy and should be able to vote and this is all bullshit” side and then the “Ok but I’m just a dude with a mortgage, how does my life actually change?”, and I came up with a pretty shitty list honestly.

    I know the Orwellian future that lies at the end of the path of the govt-run-facist-state is very dark and clearly has it’s draw backs, but in the interest of keeping us spending… all-the-time, every-time, I don’t know that future would ever come to be… people would openly oppose it and consumption/progress would grind to a halt.

    I think it’s in the rich’s best interest to create the illusion of a utopia to keep us overly happy so we spend and distract ourselves with every new gadget out there.

    Given that, is the future so bleak? I honestly don’t know… I’m still trying to get my head around what this all means *really* as far as what is going to happen next. I’m fully aware of the argument that this *should not* happen and isn’t how democracy works, I totally agree with Naomi’s assessment of what has transpired recently, in other times in histories, happening in other countries, have been given very scary names, but what just happened in the US was given a very friendly and non-scary name of “Saving the economy”.

    Thoughts guys? Personal suggestions? I’m interested in any discourse on this subject.

4 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. UK Government Needs $20 Billion for Increased Spying Program | The "Break it Down" Blog Says:

    [...] to see an agenda get sold? Check out the front page of Slashdot on Sunday. More specifically, earlier [...]

  2. Economic Crisis, The Amero, North American Union and the New World Order | The "Break it Down" Blog Says:

    [...] following day the Dow dropped 770 points. The day after that 300. And yesterday another 760 points or so for good [...]

  3. $700 Billion Bailout Is Not For Loans, It’s to Encourage Bank Mergers | The "Break it Down" Blog Says:

    [...] how we said that everything taking place during that time (and now) maps perfectly to the market crash of the [...]

  4. $700 Billion Bailout Is Not For Loans, It’s to Encourage Bank Mergers : Anything And Whatnot Says:

    [...] how we said that everything taking place during that time (and now) maps perfectly to the market crash of the [...]

Leave a Reply